View profile

Design & Critical Thinking - Week #13

Design & Critical Thinking - Week #13
By Kevin Richard • Issue #15 • View online
The Design & Critical Thinking Community update
Hi everyone,
It’s been some time since the last update! Here’s what happened on the thirteenth week of 2022.
On Tuesday 29 March, we continued our exploration of the theme “becoming better designers” through the keyword “data”, and what it means (or not) to be “data-driven”. We clarified the different kinds of data (explicit, implicit, qualitative, quantitative) and the importance of the context to make sense of them. We also discussed the ethics of using data, how they are collected and to what end.
On Thursday 31 Mars, we discussed perfectionism as a content creator and how to “leapfrog” into action. We also discussed systems thinking and design, and the knowledge economy related to design.
On Sunday 3 April, I published a critique of Systemic Design as a response to the event (in French) “Discover the Systemic Design” organised by Le Laptop.
Find below some links & resources shared in the community’s Slack.
Wish you a wonderful day and see you next week! 👋
Kevin from Design & Critical Thinking.

Using data to make decisions #becomingbetterdesigners
Virtual Chalet, 29 March 2022 - Using data to make decisions  #becomingbetterdesigners
Virtual Chalet, 29 March 2022 - Using data to make decisions #becomingbetterdesigners
🌟 Links & resources shared by the community
Shared & written by @SidneyDebaque 👏👇
Design is about facilitation, not creation | by Sidney Debaque | Apr, 2022 | UX Collective
🎉Congrats to our friends at Field.so for their successful launch 🚀👇
Digital Headquarters for
 Product Leaders – Field
Shared by @VinishGarg with the following question:
How will they draw a line between ‘AI generated’ and ‘AI corrected’, or ‘AI edited’, or ‘AI fetched’, or ‘AI enabled’? For example you can manually write this sentence—"AI generated content is ________ by Google", and then an AI fills in ‘banned’ in the blank space. Is it AI-generated?
Google Says AI Generated Content Is Against Guidelines
Shared by @CorinaLupu with the following comment:
Great article about the fallacy behind statistics. If you’re bothered by the length of the article, scan through the history and read carefully starting with here ” To get rid of the stain of eugenics, statistics needs to free itself from the ideal of being perfectly objective” One precision, the writer of the article has a PhD in Mathematics and teaches Philosophy of probability and statistics at University. 
How Eugenics Shaped Statistics - Nautilus | Science Connected
Shared by @PascalWicht with the following comment:
Shenzhen is 17,5 million people.
The degree of social coordination and engineering to manage such a scale.
The ripple into global supply chains.
The compounding effect on the reste of the permacrisis.
Design Journeys - A Systemic Design Tourbook - Design Dialogues
Making Things Better (With Enabling Constraints and POPCORN)
🍻Join the community on Slack for more! https://join.designcriticalthinking.com
Thanks for your time & trust! 🙏
Kevin from Design & Critical Thinking.
Did you enjoy this issue?
Kevin Richard

Design & Critical Thinking (D&CT) aims to build shared understanding, collective knowledge & sensemaking through a community of professionals from different backgrounds and horizons.

In order to unsubscribe, click here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue